3 years, 2 months and 29 days . . . not that i'm counting!
- CF
are you still "in"?
have you altogether stopped attending meetings?
for how long have you been "out"?
3 years, 2 months and 29 days . . . not that i'm counting!
- CF
i would get excited when i was younger and would study the watchtower and see that this weeks study only had 19 paragraphs.
(made the study seem shorter,lol).
when a meeting would get canceled because of snow (which was rare) and i would get to stay home and watch a cheers or the cosby show.
The best was when the visiting speaker for the Sunday public talk didn't show up. It would be 10:05 and you'd see the brothers scrambling trying to figure out what to do . . . flip the talk with the Watchtower Study and hope he shows up later - or get another elder to do an impromptu talk. Usually they would get another elder to fill in, but I remember once they didn't and we got to go home an hour early . . . woo hoo!!
CF
how many times did you hear that before you were baptized?
i got a little tired of it when someone called me and said that.
this was the first sign of the control thing.
Great thread. Here's another angle . . . the bluffing "I've missed you" comment.
When I was drifting, I would miss one or maybe two meetings a week, but would go, on average, at least once per week. There was another sister at the hall who would disappear for months at a time and then re-appear as Sister MegaSpiritual - trying to encourage all the lowly and down-trodden.
So, every once in a while, she would be the one to give me the "I've missed you" remark. Finally, I realized, that she probably missed me, because she wasn't there either . . . so I called her bluff and, with my most genuine, concerned expression on my face, said, "Oh, that's right, you've been away for a little while now. Are you doing ok?". She was taken aback and didn't quite know how to respond. She said, "oh, yes. . . I'm ok". I responded with, "that's good. I hope to see you next week." and walked away with my head held quite high.
CF
yep, that's how she says it.
and hamgurber.
my niece used to say "scum-screen".
Here are some of the best ones from my neices and nephews (they're so cute and priceless, I actually got a little sad when they started pronouncing the words correctly):
this is just one of many stories of a particular adventure i had, and one that i have thought of many times over the years.
i?ve been on a lot of road trips, mostly in the us.
i have always come across friendly folk, and this is a particularly heart-warming experience that i wanted to share with y?all tonight.
Talesin,
You left out the part of the story where you found out Mr. and Mrs. Terri were really Brother and Sister Terri . . . because of course - only JWs are capable of showing true love and hospitality. Certainly this didn't come from anyone in the world, right?
Great story, thanks for sharing!
CF
the watchtower, june 15, 2004 issue, pages 14-24:.
" for the benefit of current readers, the answer is reprinted on pages 29-31 of this magazine.
19 near its conclusion, the reprinted answer on pages 29-31 says: "does the fact that opinions and conscientious decisions may differ mean that the issue is inconsequential?
Undisfellowshipped, thanks for posting these articles. I totally agree with you.
If it is wrong to accept the four major components, then how can they say it's up to your conscience to accept a part/fraction of one of the four major components.
I seem to remember being taught that just because something is small and seems insignificant, if it is a part of something that is wrong . . . our "christian conscience" would want no part of it! For example: a "christian" wouldn't work in a grocery store that sold cigarettes; or we wouldn't want to work for a government agency that made weapons; or we wouldn't want to accept other work in lieu of fighting in a war because it is, however seemingly unrelated, still supporting the war.
I can't believe their reasoning and how they just write the rules to support their stories. The sad part is so many people have suffered and died from this insanity!
CF
the watchtower, june 15, 2004 issue, pages 14-24:.
" for the benefit of current readers, the answer is reprinted on pages 29-31 of this magazine.
19 near its conclusion, the reprinted answer on pages 29-31 says: "does the fact that opinions and conscientious decisions may differ mean that the issue is inconsequential?
Elsewhere, I had the same exact thought!
If the only acceptable use for "whole" blood was to offer it as a sacrifice, then accepting fractions violates this "law" because to break the blood down into fractions requires the handling the blood in ways that are "unacceptable" to begin with:
CF
i'll tell you what niggles me and makes me cringe at the same time, its sitting in a boring lecture at work on a managers "away day" and having someone keep using those same tired dick-head phrases that i hate.. eg:.
"lets think outside the box".
"lets all network in groups".
and to quote Carson from Queer Eye for the Straight Guy . . . "but there is an M and an E" in "team".
i'll tell you what niggles me and makes me cringe at the same time, its sitting in a boring lecture at work on a managers "away day" and having someone keep using those same tired dick-head phrases that i hate.. eg:.
"lets think outside the box".
"lets all network in groups".
"go to the source" - used to encourage people to confirm something directly with the person who said it . . . not gossip and speculate with others
"below the mat" - used to reference inappropriate work behavior (i.e. making racist or sexist comments is below the mat)
"ride the wave" - adapt well to change
la amistad
cinque speaking of his ancestors.
"i will call into the past from back to the beginning of time and beg them to come and help me at the judgment.
"Wow, that's weird . . . not "weird" weird, but "exciting" weird" - Breakfast Club
CF